|
|
Post by Mike Rosseel on Mar 11, 2010 19:14:01 GMT -5
BTW, speaking of drugs, there was a hell of an article in the APP and other papers today about the biggest pot bust in NJ. If anyone noticed, all of the mentioned towns were affluent ones, not Long Branch, Asbury Park etc. The problem is everywhere. Brian, the officer smelled the pot burning from there chimney, thats how they got busted.lol Also, i apologize if I broke the rules again! Mrs. Lisa (no lastname)just one final question, for someone who doesn't know alot about the mayor because you didnt care when you moved here, you know an alot about his private work, and business......interesting! Its been fun lisa (no lastname)., its been fun! =) |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Rosseel on Mar 11, 2010 23:12:59 GMT -5
Brian, why was the last post deleted, it refered to user name lisa and our councilmen newman, is that a violation of some sorts? Alls I was asking is, is there a connection between them two? no violations as per your rules
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Rosseel on Mar 12, 2010 9:38:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by truthinesshurts on Mar 12, 2010 11:42:47 GMT -5
I find it interesting that info against an offical that made a mistake, paid the price and has moved on from. You guys, Im not saying what he did was right but don't you think he paid his price....Im sure recent GOP canidates have skeletons in the closet but you probaly supported them! Ddgiler, if you think this is in connection with the task force being removed, where is the proof, why hasnt anyone brought this up since 2004? Im not saying your not right, maybe you are but where is the proof. You and Truth can come on here and make accusations hidden behind a fake name, if you know something and have facts, expose these people, and expose yourselves! I didn't level any accusations, I just want understand what is being said. And please don't make assumptions about who I am and who I support politically based on the fact that I'm not foolish enough to use my real name on the internet. It's a really unattractive habit, and only emphasizes how naïve you are. Good day to you, sir. |
|
|
|
Post by Mike Rosseel on Mar 12, 2010 13:11:57 GMT -5
I find it interesting that info against an offical that made a mistake, paid the price and has moved on from. You guys, Im not saying what he did was right but don't you think he paid his price....Im sure recent GOP canidates have skeletons in the closet but you probaly supported them! Ddgiler, if you think this is in connection with the task force being removed, where is the proof, why hasnt anyone brought this up since 2004? Im not saying your not right, maybe you are but where is the proof. You and Truth can come on here and make accusations hidden behind a fake name, if you know something and have facts, expose these people, and expose yourselves! I didn't level any accusations, I just want understand what is being said. And please don't make assumptions about who I am and who I support politically based on the fact that I'm not foolish enough to use my real name on the internet. It's a really unattractive habit, and only emphasizes how naïve you are. Good day to you, sir. Well truth, then please explain to my "naive" self, what was the purpose of uploading that article? Aren't you placing the assumption that one of our officals is the cause of this program being removed? I think you could provide some facts SIR! FYI, i mentioned nothing of your party support, the key word was "probaly' supported them, didnt say you did! Also, I dont think I assumed who you are either. Taking a simple statement and making it into something else is very unattractive for you SIR! Using your real name makes you foolish? or does it make you have credibility? I could come on here as mickey mouse and bash everyone too, but i think that would make me a coward! Personal credibilty, thats what it boils down too! |
|
|
|
Post by truthinesshurts on Mar 12, 2010 14:19:37 GMT -5
No article was "uploaded". No assumption was made - that was the whole point of my post, comprende? I provided a link and asked a question. If you are going to take issue with anyone, shouldn't it be with ddigler? He posted the allegatory blind item, SIR!.
Since "probaly" isn't a real word, SIR!, I'm just going to sit back and have a quiet laugh at you repeating it over and over again as a qualifier. (SIR!)
Yes, in my opinion, anyone who uses their real name on a message board like this is a fool. You might want to read up on the topic of "personal security on the internet," boyo. (On while you are at it, look into the subject of netiquette. A hint: when you don't like what it said on one forum, it is really poor form to go crying about it on another forum.)
Now, SIR!, I am done with you and your inane rantings. You are welcome to have the last word, just as long as it is a REAL word, and spelled correctly, SIR!
|
|
|
|
Post by Mike Rosseel on Mar 12, 2010 15:56:36 GMT -5
Think outside Freehold Borough and ask yourself why this just so happened to have happened at the same time one of the town officials had his run in with the PD. Coincidently, the officer involved in that case just so happens to be the same one that ran the JIT team...hmmm. This same official is very tied in at the county level also..hmmmmm. The JIT team was only FTPD and FBPD members also, not a multi town team. ddigler, Is this a good place to start if someone wants to ask questions? newstranscript.gmnews.com/news/2004-04-21/Front_page/060.htmlUr right, I stand corrected, you didnt post that link and ask is this a good place to start!!! Keep hiding, keep bashing people behind a monitor, thats proper! Look that one up! And I think if you run your mouth about a person and refuse to allow them to know who you are, that makes you a coward! Laugh away! |
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 12, 2010 20:20:09 GMT -5
A post from ddigler was removed due to making serious allegations that could not be backed up. This was done to err on the side of caution and not fuel unfounded rumors.
As a result, two more posts were removed, one from truthinesshurts, and the other from Mike Rosseel. There was nothing wrong with either post, they just lost their context with the first post removed.
Truthy, that article you provided a link to was an interesting read.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 12, 2010 20:23:00 GMT -5
Truthinesshurts wrote:
(On while you are at it, look into the subject of netiquette. A hint: when you don't like what it said on one forum, it is really poor form to go crying about it on another forum.)
You put a smile on my face with that one, Truthy. I have been watching a small handful of people going to other sites to complain about this one for some time. I always found that hysterical- and flattering to think we have such a dedicated fan club. Facebook alone has become full of lies about this site. I love it.
|
|
|
|
Post by truthinesshurts on Mar 13, 2010 13:13:00 GMT -5
Truthy, that article you provided a link to was an interesting read. There's another article on the News Transcript site you'd "probaly" find enlightening and I believe the APP also ran a few articles. |
|
|
|
Post by truthinesshurts on Mar 13, 2010 13:15:26 GMT -5
Keep hiding, keep bashing people behind a monitor, thats proper! Look that one up! And I think if you run your mouth about a person and refuse to allow them to know who you are, that makes you a coward! Laugh away! Think this woman doesn't regret having used her real name on the internet? www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/hunterdon_woman_shocked_after.html |
|
BrianSullivan
Full Member
Good ideas never cross burned bridges. Practice unity in our community
Posts: 1,041
|
Post by BrianSullivan on Mar 13, 2010 14:33:26 GMT -5
Keep hiding, keep bashing people behind a monitor, thats proper! Look that one up! And I think if you run your mouth about a person and refuse to allow them to know who you are, that makes you a coward! Laugh away! Think this woman doesn't regret having used her real name on the internet? www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/03/hunterdon_woman_shocked_after.htmlVery good article with mentions of facebook pitfalls too. That is why it is right tha this site does protect the ID of those who wish to remain anonymous. It is their right to do so if they wish. |
|
|
|
Post by richardkelsey on Mar 15, 2010 9:29:11 GMT -5
Truthinesshurts wrote: (On while you are at it, look into the subject of netiquette. A hint: when you don't like what it said on one forum, it is really poor form to go crying about it on another forum.) You put a smile on my face with that one, Truthy. I have been watching a small handful of people going to other sites to complain about this one for some time. I always found that hysterical- and flattering to think we have such a dedicated fan club. Facebook alone has become full of lies about this site. I love it. What's so funny about this is -- those people who use these other sites are so poorly behaved on those sites too, that they actually enhance the credibility of our site when they post. One poster spends much of his free time telling anyone who will listen on any site that he was banned for his opinion. He was banned 3 separate times for substantial violations of the rules of this site. One time, his ban was endorsed by his own father. We want to give people a chance to discuss issues. We know that tempers flair. We know that opinions differ. We know that people have personal relationships with those who sometimes are the focus of criticism. All of that makes monitoring an art, not a science. We have used so many different techniques to help posters recognize what is and is not acceptable. I would say Brian goes far beyond the requirements by reaching out personally. In the end, however, those who routinely break the rules, and do so after warnings, and do so with what appears to be malicious intent, ultimately can't be a part of our online community. We value discussion. We value different opinions. We don't have to agree with them, and we likewise don't have to "agree to disagree." Sometimes, if your opinion is weak, we will challenge you to support it. When I have a weak opinion, I expect it to likewise be challenged. That is what we foster here that no other site does or attempts to do. That doesn't make us better -- it makes us different. Most of these other sites bring value. Indeed, I like many of the other sites. There really is only one site out there I know of that adds no value because it promotes liable, allows for multiple personalities, and is unaccountable for its posters. Even that site brings value if only for allowing us to understand who is out there, what their motives are, and how sites should not be run. The last few weeks, this site has had great debate -- it has gotten hot, and posters have pushed the envelope. That's good. But, if you break a major guideline that directly impacts another poster -- you will be either suspended, banned, or on the shortest leash known to man. Since the first day I posted here, I have done so under my name. Others too have taken to doing that. We do not, however, require posters to post by name or identify themselves to the public. We do have sign-up procedures and admin IP monitoring capability that allows us stop much of the nonsense seen on other sites. In the end, however, if you knowingly disclose the name or other personal information of another poster on this site without that poster's permission -- that is, as we have set out over two years ago -- the gravest of violations of our rules. As always, the circumstances are closely analyzed, and we try to make fair decisions and take immediate action. However, every poster here should know that violation of that rule could result in an immediate ban. In addition, if you are not banned or suspended for that violation, you should know that such a violation will be considered in analyzing any additional rule or guideline violation. That is -- your next walk over the line might not seem like a big rule violation, but if you have multiple rule violations, including a significant rule of privacy, you will likely receive a significant suspension of ban. In the end, we must protect our posters, or we will have no posters. So -- since that issue has popped up here on this thread -- I address it to everyone. And, I remind everyone to go back and re-read our guidelines. They are there to protect you and to foster healthy discussion and disagreement. Now -- let's get back on topic. This thread has lots of great issues that could be separate topics. |
|
|
|
Post by tdeck on Mar 15, 2010 12:49:14 GMT -5
I don't understand why there is so much talk about gangs here. While I am sure there maybe some gang members living in this town like every town has, what evidence is there of gang activity in Freehold? My job has me driving around town through all the streets and nothing shows me any proof of these activities, I think people may be making something out of nothing.
|
|
|
|
Post by admin on Mar 15, 2010 16:19:10 GMT -5
tdeck is temporarily banned due to questions surrounding the account. There appears to be a site violation, but, if this proves untrue that person will happily be unbanned.
|
|
