proposed new ordinance

[fiberisgoodforyou]

wlisa54 said:

I think the Boro GOP could put that in their platform as they are the ones who sign up for a committee and then quit.

Such as?

I am not familiar with ANY Grand Old Party appointee who quit???

[novillero]

wlisa54 said:

Maybe it is better to have a standard operating procedure than an ordinance. If you had an ordinance, perhaps the ordinance would prohibit the person from quitting before their term was up.

Such an Ordinance may run afoul of the 13th Amendment.

Don't be so silly with this attempt to de-rail a legitimate discussion.

[admin]

wlisa54 said:

I could throw in Sullivan too, but I sort of like him.

ps-At least Miller sticks it out.


Modified by admin for rule violation

Lisa54, now you are going to hate me. I edited some of your post due to a site rule violation.

As the admin, I protect the identity of every person who chooses to participate here. That includes keeping emails hidden when the participant wishes it.

I have to extend that standard to all participants. Part of the reason for that is because of your own post, you misidentified a person and you are not the first to make that error. I really do not want to see that game started on the site. names could get dragged through the mud when it is not even the person!

You are newer to the site, please review the guidelines and consider this a friendly warning.

Also, on a personal note, I quit HRC due to my obligations with the CIC. I wasn't adding anything to HRC, anyway. I doubt I am missed there.

[admin]

wlisa54 said:

Are you going to ban me like my evil twin Holly?

Not now, I would like to believe you are the good twin. If I was going to ban you, I would have. I would like to believe that you are going to continue being a good site participant, something Holly was not.